As international conflicts intensify amid a weakening global order, China has expanded its mediatory diplomacy. This diplomacy is comprehensive and structured, encompassing three reinforcing components: peace-brokering roles at different levels, a conceptual framework in the form of the Global Security Initiative (GSI), and an institutional foundation in the form of the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed). Together, these components offer a robust and systematic framework for addressing varied international conflicts.
China’s Mediation in Perspective
China’s earliest role as a peace broker can be traced back to 1954 with its important negotiating role at the Geneva Conference, which diplomatically and legally ended the First Indochina War. It also played a meaningful role by chairing the Six-Party Talks (2003–2007) and participating in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or the Iranian nuclear deal, in 2015.
During the late 2010s in South Asia, Beijing facilitated dialogues between Pakistan and Afghanistan under President Ashraf Ghani, as well as between Ashraf Ghani’s government and the Taliban. In 2025, China brokered a ceasefire between the Myanmar military junta and the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, and facilitated border de-escalation between Cambodia and Thailand through the “Fuxian Lake” dialogue.
China’s most notable mediatory role, which drew global attention due to its sophistication and far-reaching outcome, occurred in March 2023. Beijing quietly facilitated talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran, leading to the restoration of diplomatic relations that had been severed for seven years. This episode alone changed the dynamics of the Gulf region by reducing long-held sectarian divide.
China also tested its mediation diplomacy in the complex and conflict‑prone Middle East region. In mid‑2024, it convened Palestinian factions, including Fatah and Hamas and signed the “Beijing Declaration,” which aimed at strengthening Palestinian unity for statehood.
Following the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran in early 2026, Beijing engaged in intensive shuttle diplomacy, supported a five-point peace proposal by Pakistan calling for an immediate halt to hostilities and reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and also Pakistani mediation between Iran and the US. Beijing also promoted its own peace plans for the Ukraine conflict while maintaining ties with both Russia and Ukraine.
In the most recent case, China mediated between Pakistan and the Taliban administration through the Urumqi talks held in April 2026. The seven-day consecutive talks proved to be one of the longest sessions of mediation ever held. Unlike the carefully managed Saudi-Iranian normalization in 2023, the Urumqi talks confronted difficult issues: cross-border terrorism, disputed colonial-era borders, and the Taliban’s ties with the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which Pakistan accused of attacks on its soil.
Prior to the Urumqi talks, Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban had encountered one of the deadliest cross-border attacks in their history resulting in hundreds of casualties. This led both sides to break direct communication channels. It was unrealistic to expect the Urumqi talks to deliver a final solution to the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict. They did, however, break the stalemate, bring the two sides back to the negotiation table, and secure commitments to exercise restraint and continue diplomatic efforts.
These and other cases manifest several salient features of Chinese mediation diplomacy. These features include keeping the mediation low‑profile and away from media hype until a final settlement is reached (as seen in the Saudi Arabia-Iran and in the Pakistan-Taliban negotiations); the appointment of a special envoy to conduct focused and dedicated diplomacy (as seen in the Pakistan–Taliban talks and in the Middle East); and the use of shuttle diplomacy to prevent conflicts from sudden escalations (as seen in the case of the Pakistan–Taliban conflict).
The GSI: the Conceptual Foundation of Mediation
An important component of China’s mediation diplomacy is its conceptual foundation. In April 2022, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced the Global Security Initiative (GSI) in his keynote speech at the Boao Forum for Asia, presenting it as a new framework for ‘common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable’ security. In February 2023, China issued a detailed GSI ‘concept paper‘ outlining its guiding principles and priority areas as the conceptual basis for Beijing’s expanding mediation diplomacy.
Drawing upon China’s experiences, the GSI identifies several core commitments, including ‘respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries’ and ‘peacefully resolving differences and disputes between countries through dialogue and consultation,’ which form a key part of the discursive basis for China’s approach to conflict management and settlement. By emphasizing the vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security and the need to build a ‘balanced, effective and sustainable security architecture,’ the GSI situates China’s mediation efforts within a broader push to address security challenges through dialogue, development, and long-term stability rather than unilateral pressure or the use of force.
Notably, the scope of the GSI extends beyond mediation to include arms control dialogues, counterterrorism cooperation, cybersecurity governance, and climate-security linkages. Overall, the GSI serves as a broad conceptual umbrella for China’s mediation efforts.
IOMed: The Institutional Framework
The third key component of China’s mediation is the establishment of IOMed ( the International Organization for Mediation)in 2025 with its headquarters in Hong Kong. With now 37 Signatory States, the organization provides non‑adjudicative, non‑binding procedures focused exclusively on mediation for international disputes, positioned as a softer, Global South‑oriented complement or alternative to judicial bodies such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or arbitral institutions like the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA).
Crucially, the IOMed is the world’s first intergovernmental organization dedicated exclusively to conflict mediation. It focuses on pragmatic, consent-based dispute resolution rather than binding mandates or peace enforcement. Its uniqueness lies in offering a permanent, neutral platform where disputing parties can request tailored mediation services from a standing roster of experts, thereby lowering the political costs and ad hoc nature traditionally associated with third-party peace-making.
Conclusion
It is the first time that any country has introduced a comprehensive mediation mechanism beyond traditional, sporadic peace-brokering efforts. China has combined three mutually reinforcing components: practical case experience gives substance to the GSI’s discourse of ‘common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable’ security, while IOMed offers a standing, rules-based platform through which that vision can be operationalized. Beijing’s mediatory diplomacy is likely to steadily gain traction commensurate with its expanding global footprint, growing record of high-profile mediation cases, and increasing willingness of warring parties, particularly in the Global South, to seek alternatives to traditional Western-led peace initiatives.
