Just because trade is unbalanced, doesn’t mean it’s unfair.

Although the likelihood of an armistice is remote, it is not impossible.

What is Trump’s rationale in expanding the trade skirmishes? What, ultimately, is his end game? While Trump, as any human being, has many sides to him, his ideological inclinations need to be taken more seriously.

Following the successful summit earlier in July, many observers excitedly noted the increased possibilities of cooperation between the EU and China. But does the EU have the strategic vision and commitment necessary to truly take advantage of its new relationship with China?

In an era of trade protectionism and negative sentiment towards globalization, Israel is continuing its liberal approach, further opening its economy to global multinationals, trade, and investment. While its traditional trade partner from the West and its rising trade partner from the East are fighting a trade war, Israel remains neutral, allowing Israeli companies to seize more opportunities for trade and investment.

Trade has gone from being a ballast stone to an albatross.

Trump’s trade wars will disrupt global trade.

Trump's protectionism is destined to endure because there is no compromise solution, James Nolt argues. Trump's idea of the problem is too far removed from reality to allow his tariff pressure to succeed.

Playing a game of chicken, the two countries are just like two cars racing to each other, expecting the opponent to dodge at the last minute. Given the low speed, there will be limited damage even if no one dodges. But more rounds of collision with higher speed will inflict more serious damage on both.

As the Chinese economy becomes larger and more international, the externalities of the Chinese mode have challenged the international market. While assessing the Chinese model, I believe it necessary to de-ideologize, and draw upon the lessons of East Asia.