
Philip Cunningham, Independent Scholar
May 04, 2026
The Trump administration’s war against Iran is portrayed as a reckless and ill-timed failure that caused massive humanitarian damage, destabilized the region, and disrupted global trade while failing to achieve regime change. China is depicted as a cautious but increasingly credible actor calling for stability and open trade, highlighting shifting global dynamics as the conflict leaves a volatile crisis marked by a fragile ceasefire, blocked oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and a high risk of renewed conflict.

Wang Youming, Senior Research Fellow of BRICS Economic Think Tank, Tsinghua University
Apr 27, 2026
Donald Trump’s fixation on Cuba is driven by a combination of strategic and political considerations: a “Western Hemisphere first” approach, tactics to advance the Trump Doctrine and the practical aim of replicating the Venezuelan model to bolster the U.S. president’s midterm election prospects.

Zhao Xiuye, Pre-doctoral Research Fellow, Centre on Contemporary China and the World
Apr 24, 2026
For countries dependent on imported oil, America’s war with Iran and its disruptions on global oil supplies have made China’s renewable energy strategy more attractive. While the Trump administration is doubling down on global oil dominance, China has an opportunity to strengthen its position as the renewable powerhouse while managing concerns of over dependence on Chinese renewable technologies and supply chains.

Zahid Anwar, Pro-Vice-President at the University of Peshawar, Pakistan
Apr 20, 2026
The ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran represents one of the most significant geopolitical crises of 2026. It began in late February when U.S. and Israeli forces launched large-scale strikes on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure, escalating long-standing tensions over Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence. Iran responded with missile and drone attacks across the Middle East, targeting U.S. bases and allied interests, turning the confrontation into a broader regional war. The conflict has disrupted global energy markets, intensified regional instability, and triggered fragile ceasefire efforts, highlighting the risk of prolonged confrontation and wider international consequences.

Pedro Abramovay, Vice President of Programs at the Open Society Foundations, Former Brazilian Secretary of Justice
Apr 20, 2026
Even as Israeli bombs rained down on Lebanon, most of the world breathed a cautious sigh of relief when news broke that Pakistan had mediated a ceasefire between the United States and Iran, with the goal of reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

Ted Galen Carpenter, Senior Fellow, Randolph Bourne Institute
Apr 10, 2026
The U.S.-Iran conflict is increasing instability and straining U.S. resources while undermining Washington’s global credibility and leadership. At the same time, China is capitalizing on the situation by positioning itself as a neutral, stabilizing force and expanding its diplomatic influence at the United States’ expense.

Ghulam Ali, PhD, Monash University, Australia
Apr 09, 2026
The U.S.-Israel war on Iran has brought many lessons, foremost among them the shattering of the myth of unchallenged U.S. global might. More than a month into the U.S.-Israeli aggression, neither could the war change the regime in Iran – one of the illusions upon which U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had waged the war – nor did Tehran concede to U.S. terms. Furthermore, on 2 March, Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz, through which around one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies pass. This energy lifeline remained blocked despite Trump’s repeated ultimatums and desperate calls to allies and partners to send forces to reopen it. This resistance was particularly notable as Iran has been under crippling sanctions for decades.

Dan Steinbock, Founder, Difference Group
Apr 04, 2026
After one month of hostilities and no exit plans, the lethal costs of the U.S.-Israel joint war against Iran are global. How will the crisis reverberate against the backdrop of elevated U.S.-China relations?

Sujit Kumar Datta, Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Mar 30, 2026
The organization, which is historically tied to the United States is facing new questions. Donald Trump’s rhetoric has offended America’s European allies, and several of them do not want to get involved in an unpopular war. Unless resolved, such frictions will reduce NATO from a unity platform to a contest of priorities.

Jin Liangxiang, Senior Research Fellow, Shanghai Institute of Int'l Studies
Mar 29, 2026
The pretext for Trump’s aggression against Iran, in partnership with Israel, is flimsy. As the saying goes, even a gentle rabbit may bite when cornered. The current war is, in some respects, an extreme manifestation of hegemony. And the whole world is paying the price.
